WASHINGTON (RTWnews) — A dozen past leaders of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, including both Republican and Democratic appointees, have issued a strong condemnation of new assertions made by the FDA that question the safety of vaccines.
These former officials argue that the agency's plans to reform how life-saving vaccines for COVID-19, flu, and other respiratory diseases are managed — disclosed in an internal memo last week — could significantly harm public health, particularly for high-risk Americans.
“The proposed new directives are not merely minor changes or coherent updates in policy. They represent a significant shift in the FDA's understanding of its duties,” the ex-commissioners stated in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The internal memorandum drafted by FDA vaccine chief Dr. Vinay Prasad, while not publicly released, has been verified by sources familiar with its content. The document alleges without evidence that COVID-19 vaccines led to the deaths of 10 children, and it outlines forthcoming changes regarding the administration of vaccines, suggesting that dissenting FDA staff should resign.
Among the initiatives proposed by Prasad was a revision of protocols concerning annual flu shot updates and an increased focus on the risks and benefits of concurrent vaccinations. Despite claims from vaccine skeptics about the overwhelming effect of multiple shots on children’s immune systems, scientific studies have consistently found no evidence to support such concerns.
The FDA's proposed changes occur alongside an ongoing overhaul of federal vaccination policies spearheaded by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a historical figure in the anti-vaccine movement. Kennedy has already dismissed members of the CDC advisory committee on vaccines and replaced them with appointees of his choosing, while also terminating the recent CDC director within weeks over vaccine policy disagreements.
Former FDA leaders noted that the claims regarding child deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines rely on a surveillance system lacking in medical records necessary to establish causation. They emphasize that significant research shows COVID-19 vaccines effectively lower the risk of severe illness and hospitalization in children.
Ultimately, the ex-FDA officials argue that the new proposals would overturn established scientific principles regarding the evaluation of vaccines. They could hinder innovation in vaccine development and limit public transparency during this crucial process.
—-
This article was originally reported by RTWnews and is part of an ongoing effort to provide comprehensive coverage of public health issues.
