NEW YORK (RTWNews) — The Justice Department has released a significant volume of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, yet the absence of key materials has fueled discontent among advocates and victims. The lack of FBI interviews with survivors and internal memos regarding prosecution decisions has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the disclosures in holding accountable those connected to Epstein.

Despite the flood of new documents, the release is criticized for not shedding light on important decisions that allowed Epstein to plead guilty to lesser charges in 2008. Moreover, notable associates, including former Prince Andrew, are mysteriously absent from the records, leading many to question the thoroughness of the investigation.

While new details have emerged, including insights into the Justice Department's decision to abandon a comprehensive inquiry into Epstein in the 2000s, many reports continue to lack context or remain heavily redacted. The current releases are just the start of what could be an extended disclosure process, as critics demand a complete and transparent accounting of Epstein's actions and the systemic failures that enabled them. Victims, like Marina Lacerda, express frustration, stating that the justice system continues to let them down, underscoring the need for accountability in such high-profile cases.