ICE's recent directive has come under scrutiny after an internal memo was released, highlighting the agency's right to forcibly enter homes without a judge's warrant. This decision reverses decades of guidance aimed at respecting Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches.

The memo allows ICE officers to act on narrower administrative warrants solely to arrest individuals with final removal orders, a decision immigration advocates argue undermines established legal norms and threatens the rights of immigrants.

This shift in enforcement policy coincides with the Trump administration's broader push for aggressive immigration crackdowns nationwide, drawing criticism from immigrant rights groups and legal experts who deem the policy unconstitutional.

For years, immigrants have been advised to refuse entry to agents without a judicial warrant; this memo contradicts that advice, further escalating tensions and fear within immigrant communities.

Despite concerns, ICE officials defend the new policy, claiming individuals targeted have already undergone due process. However, advocates worry the memo will lead to increased coercive practices that undermine civil liberties.

This controversial memo has sparked calls for legal challenges and opposition from local governments against perceived overreach by federal immigration authorities.