Skip to main content
RealTime Wire
PoliticsA federal judge in Boston is set to consider a motion requiring the Trump administration to continue funding the SNAP food aid program despite the government shutdown, as Democratic officials argue the administration has a legal obligation to keep it operating.

Federal Judge to Review SNAP Funding Amid Government Shutdown

A federal hearing in Boston will explore the Trump administration's obligation to continue funding the SNAP program during the government shutdown, which affects millions of Americans relying on food assistance.

Source: AP1 min read
Federal Judge to Review SNAP Funding Amid Government Shutdown
Image via AP

In brief

As the U.S. Department of Agriculture plans to halt Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payments due to a government shutdown, a federal judge is set to hear arguments challenging the administration's decision. Over 41 million Americans depend on SNAP, and state officials are demanding that federal funds be used to maintain the program. The cost of SNAP is approximately $8 billion monthly.

BOSTON (RTW News) — A federal judge in Boston is poised to address a crucial motion regarding the Trump administration's funding of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) amidst the ongoing government shutdown.

This hearing, scheduled for Thursday, occurs just two days prior to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's announcement to freeze SNAP payments, citing an inability to continue funding due to the shutdown. SNAP aids around one in eight Americans and has been a critical aspect of the national social safety net.

Concerns regarding the potential suspension of SNAP payments have sent states, food banks, and recipients into a frenzy as they scramble to secure food assistance. As news spread in October about the impending cuts on November 1st, many states signaled their intent to utilize their own funds to keep portions of the program operational.

Lawyers general and governors from 25 states and the District of Columbia have disputed the proposed pause on the program, arguing that the administration is legally bound to ensure its continuity. The administration maintains that it does not have the authority to utilize a contingency fund earmarked for about $5 billion, which contradicts an earlier USDA commitment that stated these funds would help sustain SNAP during the shutdown.

State officials are adamant that not only can this contingency fund be leveraged, but it is essential for maintaining food security across the nation. Critics of the administration also cite a separate pot of funds, approximating $23 billion, which they believe should be made available for this purpose.

The SNAP program itself costs around $8 billion each month and has provided vital support to approximately 41 million individuals last year, with two-thirds of recipients being families with children. It remains unclear how rapidly the electronic benefits transfer (EBT) cards used by beneficiaries for grocery purchases might be reloaded following the court's decision, a process that typically extends from one to two weeks.

Topics

More on this story