A jury in LA has delivered a damning verdict for two of the world's most popular digital platforms, Instagram and YouTube.
It ruled those apps are addictive and deliberately engineered that way, with their owners negligent in the safeguarding of children who use them.
This is a sombre moment for Silicon Valley, and the implications are global. The tech giants, Meta and Google, must now pay $6 million (£4.5 million) in damages to a young woman known as Kaley, the victim at the centre of this case, who claimed the platforms left her with body dysmorphia, depression, and suicidal thoughts.
Both companies intend to appeal, with Meta asserting that a single app cannot be solely responsible for a teen mental health crisis, and Google arguing that YouTube is not a social network.
Currently, the ruling signals a shift in how courts view platform design as a set of choices with serious legal and social consequences. Experts suggest that this could potentially redefine the social media landscape we know.
Moreover, the verdict has been described as big tech's 'big tobacco' moment, raising questions about whether we might see regulated features or health warnings associated with social media use, much like the regulations imposed on tobacco products in the past.
The case adds to a growing number of similar lawsuits against social media companies, marking the beginning of a new era in digital accountability.
