Skip to main content
RealTime Wire
PoliticsUnited StatesPanamaGreenlandMiddle East

Trump Threatens Military Action Over Panama Canal and Greenland

In a chaotic press conference, the president-elect expresses grievances and suggests forceful tactics against foreign territories.

By Michael D. ShearSource: nytimes.com1 min read

In brief

Donald Trump's recent remarks at Mar-a-Lago have sparked significant discussions regarding his stance on international control over Panama Canal and Greenland.

In a surprising press conference held on January 7, 2025, at his Mar-a-Lago estate, President-elect Donald J. Trump described the potential for using military or economic pressure to reclaim the Panama Canal and acquire Greenland. Trump, whose agenda was marked by a collection of grievances and controversial statements, suggested these actions were crucial for U.S. national security. “If they’re not back by the time I get into office, all hell will break out in the Middle East,” Trump stated emphatically regarding hostages held by Hamas, reiterating this alarming warning multiple times. His assertions included references to past grievances, from the withdrawal from Afghanistan, ongoing offshore drilling discussions, and the legal challenges he faces.During the improvised hour-long event, Trump stood firm against the notion of relinquishing American interests in the Panama Canal, which was returned to Panama in the late 1990s under a treaty. He expressed that it may become necessary to compel Panama to yield control over the Canal, insisting that such measures align with bolstering U.S. national interests. Furthermore, Trump revisited his past interest in purchasing Greenland, which he views as pivotal for expanding the U.S. territorial footprint.These remarks align with Trump's long-standing approach of expanding control and influence, a characteristic seen in his business ventures from the late 1980s. Critics and supporters alike are closely monitoring his bold statements as his administration gears up for a potentially tumultuous start. The ramifications of such threats on international relations and geopolitical stability are yet to be fully understood.

Topics

More on this story