CHICAGO (RTWNews) — A federal judge announced on Thursday that she will impose restrictions on the use of force by federal agents against peaceful protesters and news media in Chicago, asserting that current practices infringe on constitutional rights.
The preliminary injunction was prompted by a lawsuit alleging that federal agents employed excessive force during immigration crackdowns in the Chicago area.
U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis's ruling, likely to be appealed by the Trump administration, elaborates on a prior temporary order that mandated agents to wear identification and prohibited the use of riot-control measures like tear gas against peaceful gatherings and journalists. Following her criticism of federal agents for non-compliance, she has now also required them to use body cameras.
Ellis, highlighting the vibrancy of Chicago, quoted poet Carl Sandburg and declared that it is “simply untrue” that the city is plagued by violent riots. During the hearing, both sides debated incidents from the immigration enforcement that commenced in September, including cases of force being used against demonstrators.
“I don’t find defendants’ version of events credible,” said Ellis.
She stipulated that agents must issue two warnings before deploying riot control weaponry and may only use physical force when it is “objectively necessary” to address an immediate threat.
Ellis conveyed that the trauma from federal enforcement actions has made protestors and advocates hesitant. She described situations where demonstrators faced tear gas or pointed firearms and acknowledged that such experiences deter individuals from asserting their rights. I get really nervous because it just feels like I’m not safe,” said Leslie Cortez, a youth organizer.
Ellis's preliminary injunction arises from a lawsuit filed by media outlets and protesters claiming agents applied excessive force during protests.
During the hearings, distressing accounts were shared by witnesses detailing their encounters with federal enforcement actions, which have left a marked impact on their willingness to engage in the protests. Judge Ellis's ruling seeks to establish clearer accountability and protections for those exercising their rights.
