ORLANDO, Fla. — Recent changes made by Disney to its Disability Access Service (DAS) program, which allows qualified individuals to skip long lines at the theme parks, have ignited a federal lawsuit and a call for reconsideration from advocates for the disabled.
The issue stems from the stricter eligibility criteria now imposed, which critics argue have become too narrow. Many disabled fans feel that the company is overreaching in its ability to define disabilities, as illustrated by the case of Shannon Bonadurer, who claims she was denied access to the DAS despite her medical condition.
Disney has insisted that the modifications are necessary to address abusive practices that previously allowed able-bodied guests to exploit the system. However, the backlash has revealed a deeper concern: the fine line between ensuring equitable access and inadvertently marginalizing individuals requiring special accommodations.
Overview of the DAS Program
The DAS program allows eligible visitors and their immediate families to reserve rides online, entering expedited lines that significantly reduce wait times compared to regular queues that can stretch to several hours. Introduced in 2013 as a response to exploitation of the prior system, the DAS program underwent modifications to address a sharp increase in pass allocations.
Current Eligibility Criteria
Under the new restrictions, eligibility is now primarily focused on developmental disabilities such as autism. Prospective participants must undergo a video interview with Disney representatives to assess their needs. Critics argue that this process unfairly excludes many who genuinely require assistance.
Bonadurer highlighted her frustration, stating, They are making a determination about whether you’re disabled enough, adding that her son, who has multiple disabilities, was also denied access to the program.
Continuing Disney's Commitment
Despite the changes, Disney maintains that they are committed to accommodating all guests, including those who do not meet the new DAS criteria, through alternative methods. Nonetheless, the recent backlash sheds light on the ongoing struggle for inclusivity and fairness within the theme park experience for disabled individuals.
Future Considerations
An advocacy group has submitted a shareholder proposal demanding an independent review of Disney's policies regarding disabled guests. Disney has responded, stating they intend to block this proposal, arguing that the changes are misrepresented as the cause of declining attendance.
This legal and social battle highlights the complexities that arise when attempting to create inclusive environments while managing resources effectively. How Disney addresses these concerns may shape its reputation with a key segment of its audience.
