The ruling marks a significant victory for student activists who have campaigned for individual freedoms, reflecting a modern understanding of personal rights in Thailand's schools.
Thai Court Empowers Students with Freedom to Choose Hairstyles

Thai Court Empowers Students with Freedom to Choose Hairstyles
In a landmark decision, Thailand's Supreme Administrative Court has annulled a decades-old hairstyle directive, granting students the liberty to express themselves through their hair.
After years of advocacy, students across Thailand are now permitted to showcase their personal style with their hair, following a pivotal ruling from the Supreme Administrative Court. On Wednesday, the court invalidated a 50-year-old education ministry directive that mandated short haircuts for boys and specific hairstyles for girls, stating that such regulations infringed upon individual freedoms guaranteed by the constitution.
While hairstyle rules had become more lenient in recent years, some institutions clung to the 1975 junta-issued mandate, penalizing students who strayed from its norms. This landmark decision is a response to a petition filed in 2020 by 23 public school students asserting that the long-standing directive was unconstitutional, igniting a larger discourse on personal freedom within the educational system.
Student advocates argue that the stringent hairstyle regulations undermined their dignity and right to self-expression. Panthin Adulthananusak, a graduate and activist, reflected on their struggle, stating that challenging the authoritative norms felt vital. “If no student in Thai history rose up to challenge the power of the adults that suppressed us, it would be a lifelong embarrassment,” he noted.
Although the Ministry of Education has made strides towards flexibility—permitting students to negotiate their hairstyles with schools in 2020 and officially revoking previous hair length restrictions—some schools continued enforcing outdated rules. The Supreme Court’s recent decision emphasized that any hairstyle guidelines adopted by schools must honor the dignity and freedoms of the students.
Despite the progress, Panthin expressed concern that individual schools could still impose restrictive rules under conservative administrations. However, he welcomed the court’s validation of their fight for human rights in educational settings. “I hope this court's ruling will set a new standard for the understanding about basic human rights at the school,” he remarked, reflecting a broader hope for increased personal freedoms in Thailand’s educational system.