The recent email from Elon Musk requesting federal employees to list weekly accomplishments has resulted in conflicting responses from various government departments, where agency heads have issued contrasting guidance on compliance. As confusion spreads, unions and lawmakers voice concerns about the directive's implications.
Confusion Erupts Among Federal Workers Over Musk's Accomplishment Email

Confusion Erupts Among Federal Workers Over Musk's Accomplishment Email
Elon Musk's email directive to federal employees has led to mixed responses from government agencies, sparking uncertainty amid differing guidance.
Elon Musk's email sent to federal employees on Saturday, requesting that they detail their accomplishments from the previous week, has resulted in a wave of confusion across various U.S. government agencies. The missive, touted by Musk and linked to President Trump, has generated conflicting guidance from department officials on how to respond.
Musk, who leads the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), aimed to pressure government agencies to reflect on their performance in an effort to reduce spending. The message, which reached millions of federal employees, required recipients to submit their achievements from the past week in five bullet points without revealing classified information, with a deadline set for Monday at midnight.
Responses from agency heads have varied significantly. While some encouraged compliance, others advised caution, suggesting staff wait for further clarification. President Trump has remained silent on the matter, despite Musk's assertive push.
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM), responsible for the federal government's human resources, confirmed the authenticity of the email but did not clarify whether failure to respond might impact employment. Musk's social media comment, stating that “failure to respond will be taken as a resignation,” further heightened anxiety among employees.
In a separate communication, newly appointed FBI director Kash Patel instructed staff to pause any responses, emphasizing that responses would be managed according to existing FBI procedures. The State Department also echoed this concern, asserting that no employee was obliged to report their activities outside of the established department hierarchy.
Furthermore, a senior official from the Department of Justice reassured employees that there was no indication that the email was spam or malicious. However, a follow-up from the Justice Department later confirmed the email was legitimate while advising against including sensitive information in any response.
Several agencies, including the Department of Defense and the National Security Agency, opted to recommend employees wait for more explicit guidance. The American Federation of Government Employees criticized the email as "cruel and disrespectful," expressing intent to challenge any resulting wrongful terminations.
The impact of Musk's directive on the estimated three million federal employees who were unaware of the email due to weekend leave policies remains uncertain. The email arrived shortly after Trump praised Musk's government efficiency initiatives, stating his desire to see more assertive action.
Some Republicans have defended Musk's push for a "comprehensive audit" of government operations, while others, like Senator John Curtis, expressed concern regarding the human impact of such measures, urging Musk to exercise compassion in his approach. As the situation unfolds, the fate of many federal employees hangs in the balance amidst this unprecedented intercession by an outside figure.