Syria's interim president, Ahmed al-Shara, faced criticism after the "national dialogue" failed to deliver on promises of transparency and comprehensive representation, according to participants who voiced their disappointment over the event's proceedings.
Syria's National Dialogue: An Unwelcoming Start for Future Governance
Syria's National Dialogue: An Unwelcoming Start for Future Governance
Following a two-day conference in Damascus, the initial steps towards a new democratic government in Syria leave many attendees skeptical about true inclusivity.
In the wake of decades under a dictatorial regime, hopes were high as Syria's transitional leadership hosted a "national dialogue" aimed at fostering an inclusive government. Nonetheless, the event ended in discontent for many attendees, who noted the lack of genuine engagement from the ruling Islamist factions.
Ibrahim Draji, a law professor at Damascus University, expressed his frustration with the process, claiming, "There’s no transparency," and declared the conference did not meet the criteria of a true national dialogue. Participants had anticipated a significant opportunity to impact Syria's political trajectory, especially after the rebel coalition's promises to create a representative government post-Bashar al-Assad.
Despite the expectation of a historic gathering, the conference raised more questions than answers regarding the new political landscape of Syria. As participants left the presidential palace, it was evident that the path to a truly representative and democratic governance in Syria would be fraught with challenges.
Ibrahim Draji, a law professor at Damascus University, expressed his frustration with the process, claiming, "There’s no transparency," and declared the conference did not meet the criteria of a true national dialogue. Participants had anticipated a significant opportunity to impact Syria's political trajectory, especially after the rebel coalition's promises to create a representative government post-Bashar al-Assad.
Despite the expectation of a historic gathering, the conference raised more questions than answers regarding the new political landscape of Syria. As participants left the presidential palace, it was evident that the path to a truly representative and democratic governance in Syria would be fraught with challenges.
