The Rapid Support Forces (R.S.F.) have declared a political charter aimed at establishing a rival government in Sudan as the civil war rages on. Despite claims of pursuing peace, critics warn of further chaos, especially after a diplomatic fallout with Kenya over hosting R.S.F. leaders.
Sudan's Paramilitary Forces Establish Rival Government Amid Ongoing Civil War

Sudan's Paramilitary Forces Establish Rival Government Amid Ongoing Civil War
In a controversial move, Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces have signed a political charter to create a parallel government, intensifying tensions and regional diplomatic disputes.
In a significant escalation of Sudan's civil war, the Rapid Support Forces (R.S.F.), the paramilitary group embroiled in conflict with the national military, has announced a political charter aimed at crafting a rival government in territories under its control. This new framework, signed late Saturday in Nairobi, Kenya, is described by its backers as a pathway to peace after nearly two years of brutal conflict that has resulted in thousands of deaths and widespread famine.
The charter was formalized with various allies, including the deputy leader of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North (S.P.L.M.-N.), a rebel faction that had remained uninvolved until recently but now shows allegiance to the R.S.F. However, the decision to pursue a parallel governance model has been viewed with skepticism and alarm by many observers, who label it a blatant attempt to bolster the R.S.F.’s power amid allegations of genocide from the United States.
The signing of the charter triggered a diplomatic storm, particularly after R.S.F. leaders, many of whom face U.S. sanctions for war crimes, appeared confidently in Kenya’s capital. In response, Sudan's military-led government condemned Kenya's actions as "disgraceful" and a potential "act of hostility," leading to the withdrawal of their ambassador from Nairobi.
Kenya’s Foreign Ministry clarified that its intention was merely to provide a platform for critical discussions among Sudanese factions to avert further descent into chaos. However, this handling of the situation has drawn ire domestically, with critics accusing President William Ruto of committing diplomatic blunders that echo complicity in the atrocities faced by the Sudanese populace.
Public sentiment in Kenya has turned against the R.S.F., with local media prominently denouncing its leader, Lt. Gen. Mohamed Hamdan, branding him “The Butcher.” As Sudan grapples with this internal strife and the implications of international relations, the path towards peace remains fraught with challenges and uncertainty.