The US government is reportedly exploring a range of options to acquire Greenland, with discussions indicating the potential use of military force, according to statements from the White House.
Officials emphasized that securing Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, is considered a 'national security priority'. This declaration follows a proactive stance taken by European leaders who rallied in support of Denmark's sovereignty.
European leaders expressed their unified support for Denmark, asserting that 'Greenland belongs to its people', and underscoring the importance of resolving the matter respectfully and in accordance with international law.
President Trump has previously articulated the necessity of Greenland for US security, leading to concerns raised by Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who warned that any hostile actions by the US could disrupt NATO's foundational principles.
The White House confirmed on Tuesday that the administration is weighing different avenues to pursue this goal, clarifying that military force remains an option. A joint statement from six European allies emphasized that Arctic security should be a collective effort among NATO allies.
Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed these discussions but called for 'respectful dialogue,' grounding his remarks in the principles of territorial integrity.
The recent conversations about Greenland have gained momentum following a US military intervention in Venezuela. In the wake of that operation, a senior Trump aide's online social media post sparked significant controversy and speculation regarding potential intentions towards Greenland.
An unnamed US official indicated that options may include outright purchasing Greenland or negotiating a Compact of Free Association. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen noted that discussions with US officials should help clear 'certain misunderstandings'.
As military interest grows in the Arctic region, concerns over Russian and Chinese activities compound the urgency surrounding the future of Greenland. Historically, Trump's previous remarks on acquiring the island as a 'real estate deal' echo through current dialogues, underscoring the strategic significance attributed to Greenland's untapped natural resources.
Despite ongoing considerations, the people of Greenland overwhelmingly oppose becoming part of the US, desiring continued self-governance and sovereignty over their lands.
