A Brooklyn McDonald’s has adopted a new policy requiring customers under the age of 20 to present identification and be accompanied by a parent, in response to increasing incidents of violence and disorder. This decision comes in the wake of a series of troubling events, including an attack on a security guard by masked teens and other disruptions that have plagued the establishment.
Brooklyn McDonald's Implements ID Requirement for Under-20s Amid Rising Crime Concerns
Brooklyn McDonald's Implements ID Requirement for Under-20s Amid Rising Crime Concerns
New policy requires minors to be accompanied by a parent or provide identification, reflecting national safety struggles in fast-food chains.
Located at Nostrand and Flatbush Avenues, the McDonald’s has struggled with unruly behavior from young patrons for over a year, according to Amber Bussain, a 19-year-old manager at the restaurant. Bussain reports that large groups—sometimes up to 20—have invaded the premises, engaging in disruptive actions such as harassing customers, stealing from delivery drivers, and even smoking marijuana.
The NYPD has become a frequent presence at this location, responding to 29 calls just in 2025 and receiving over 100 complaints annually for the last three years. With management feeling overwhelmed by the unfolding chaos, they have opted for this more severe measure to restore safety in the vicinity.
The policy has generated mixed reactions within the community. Supporters emphasize its necessity in enhancing overall safety, while opponents contend that it unjustly impacts all young individuals due to the misconduct of a few.
Across the nation, McDonald’s franchises are grappling with similar challenges, with some resorting to private security or curfews to mitigate late-night disturbances. This latest initiative from the Brooklyn outlet underscores a broader trend of businesses proactively addressing security concerns in an increasingly volatile environment.
As the situation evolves, the effectiveness of this new policy remains in question—will it successfully deter disruptive behavior, or merely relocate it to other venues?
The NYPD has become a frequent presence at this location, responding to 29 calls just in 2025 and receiving over 100 complaints annually for the last three years. With management feeling overwhelmed by the unfolding chaos, they have opted for this more severe measure to restore safety in the vicinity.
The policy has generated mixed reactions within the community. Supporters emphasize its necessity in enhancing overall safety, while opponents contend that it unjustly impacts all young individuals due to the misconduct of a few.
Across the nation, McDonald’s franchises are grappling with similar challenges, with some resorting to private security or curfews to mitigate late-night disturbances. This latest initiative from the Brooklyn outlet underscores a broader trend of businesses proactively addressing security concerns in an increasingly volatile environment.
As the situation evolves, the effectiveness of this new policy remains in question—will it successfully deter disruptive behavior, or merely relocate it to other venues?
