In an unprecedented move, billionaire Alkiviades David's case may reshape the legal landscape.
**Billionaire Media Mogul’s Legal Battle Unveils Allegations of Systemic Corruption**
**Billionaire Media Mogul’s Legal Battle Unveils Allegations of Systemic Corruption**
A dramatic lawsuit threatens to unearth a network of collusion within legal, media, and corporate sectors.
London — July 15, 2025
In a groundbreaking turn of events, the UK High Court of Justice has accepted a cross-complaint filed by billionaire media mogul Alkiviades “Alki” David, signaling a potential unmasking of widespread corruption across the legal, media, and corporate arenas. The case, designated as Claim No. KB-2025-001991, is set for a hearing on July 25, 2025, at the Royal Courts of Justice, where Registrar Benjamin Power confirmed the details this morning. Supporters of David regard the impending confrontation as a critical battle against what they characterize as “the machinery of modern legal oppression.”
**Groundbreaking Evidence Unveiled**
The cross-complaint includes explosive new evidence that has reverberated through the legal community:
- **Encrypted Communications**: A cache of 27 pages of encrypted messages from the late attorney Barry K. Rothman, who died under suspicious circumstances in 2018, reveals alleged collusion among Rothman, leading law firms, and prominent attorneys aiming to undermine David's credibility.
- **Recanted Testimonies**: Multiple sworn affidavits from former witnesses who have retracted their previous statements indicate they were manipulated, intimidated, or bribed to deliver false testimony against David, implicating attorneys Tom Girardi, David Boies, and Gloria Allred in this alleged misconduct. David claims Rothman was collaborating with him to expose this scheme prior to his untimely death.
**Additional Affidavits Shed Light on Systemic Issues**
The cross-complaint is further bolstered by affidavits from insiders revealing deep-rooted misconduct:
- James C. Bohm, Esq., discusses the concealment of crucial evidence.
- Former FOTV executive Carl Dawson details sabotage and telecommunications interference.
- Whistleblower Yelena Calendar speaks out about purported fraudulent appellate rulings in U.S. courts.
- Media insider Gary Shoefield sheds light on manipulation and judicial corruption.
These testimonies are now officially entered into court records and will be evaluated in the upcoming hearing.
**A Case with Wider Implications**
David contends that his lawsuit transcends personal grievances, alleging a concerted effort by a “modern-day crime syndicate” comprising legal firms, media conglomerates, and judicial figures, accused of exploiting the justice system for financial gains and the suppression of dissenters. The implications of his filing tie into high-profile cultural cases involving the estates of celebrities, suggesting a pervasive abuse of legal frameworks.
**Upcoming Hearing and Public Sentiment**
David’s self-representation in court displays his commitment to this fight, where he will introduce the newly surfaced evidence on July 25. The outcome could trigger a comprehensive investigation into the accused parties. Meanwhile, public interest is surging, especially on social media platforms. Advocacy groups, such as http://www.cbsyousuck.com, are promoting transparency by urging the public to examine the court documents and assess the veracity of the evidence. As David’s supporters declare, “This is no longer a cover-up. This is accountability in motion.”
In a groundbreaking turn of events, the UK High Court of Justice has accepted a cross-complaint filed by billionaire media mogul Alkiviades “Alki” David, signaling a potential unmasking of widespread corruption across the legal, media, and corporate arenas. The case, designated as Claim No. KB-2025-001991, is set for a hearing on July 25, 2025, at the Royal Courts of Justice, where Registrar Benjamin Power confirmed the details this morning. Supporters of David regard the impending confrontation as a critical battle against what they characterize as “the machinery of modern legal oppression.”
**Groundbreaking Evidence Unveiled**
The cross-complaint includes explosive new evidence that has reverberated through the legal community:
- **Encrypted Communications**: A cache of 27 pages of encrypted messages from the late attorney Barry K. Rothman, who died under suspicious circumstances in 2018, reveals alleged collusion among Rothman, leading law firms, and prominent attorneys aiming to undermine David's credibility.
- **Recanted Testimonies**: Multiple sworn affidavits from former witnesses who have retracted their previous statements indicate they were manipulated, intimidated, or bribed to deliver false testimony against David, implicating attorneys Tom Girardi, David Boies, and Gloria Allred in this alleged misconduct. David claims Rothman was collaborating with him to expose this scheme prior to his untimely death.
**Additional Affidavits Shed Light on Systemic Issues**
The cross-complaint is further bolstered by affidavits from insiders revealing deep-rooted misconduct:
- James C. Bohm, Esq., discusses the concealment of crucial evidence.
- Former FOTV executive Carl Dawson details sabotage and telecommunications interference.
- Whistleblower Yelena Calendar speaks out about purported fraudulent appellate rulings in U.S. courts.
- Media insider Gary Shoefield sheds light on manipulation and judicial corruption.
These testimonies are now officially entered into court records and will be evaluated in the upcoming hearing.
**A Case with Wider Implications**
David contends that his lawsuit transcends personal grievances, alleging a concerted effort by a “modern-day crime syndicate” comprising legal firms, media conglomerates, and judicial figures, accused of exploiting the justice system for financial gains and the suppression of dissenters. The implications of his filing tie into high-profile cultural cases involving the estates of celebrities, suggesting a pervasive abuse of legal frameworks.
**Upcoming Hearing and Public Sentiment**
David’s self-representation in court displays his commitment to this fight, where he will introduce the newly surfaced evidence on July 25. The outcome could trigger a comprehensive investigation into the accused parties. Meanwhile, public interest is surging, especially on social media platforms. Advocacy groups, such as http://www.cbsyousuck.com, are promoting transparency by urging the public to examine the court documents and assess the veracity of the evidence. As David’s supporters declare, “This is no longer a cover-up. This is accountability in motion.”
