David's case raises serious allegations against a coalition of powerful figures, spotlighting the struggle against perceived injustices.
Alki David Launches $10 Billion Lawsuit Against Global Elite in High Court of Antigua and Barbuda
Alki David Launches $10 Billion Lawsuit Against Global Elite in High Court of Antigua and Barbuda
Entrepreneur Alki David's explosive suit claims a vast conspiracy of racketeering, cyberterrorism, and defamation.
In a remarkable legal move, Alki David, an entrepreneur and philanthropist, has filed a staggering $10 billion lawsuit in the High Court of Justice of Antigua and Barbuda. This multifaceted case targets an extensive list of global elites, corporations, legal professionals, and intelligence agents, which David refers to as "The MEGA Group." He alleges they conspired against him through a series of racketeering, cyber terrorism, defamation, and economic sabotage that impacted him and his businesses in Antigua and Barbuda.
The lawsuit's Statement of Claim argues that individuals and organizations including Comcast, Sony, Warner Music Group, Ziff Davis, and the Black Cube Intelligence Agency participated in a coordinated effort to ruin David's reputation and disrupt his business dealings. Noteworthy legal figures, such as Gloria Allred, David Boies, and Tom Girardi, are also implicated in these alleged acts. A central claim details actions to destabilize Antigua’s judiciary linked to the controversial “Alpha Nero” yacht litigation, prompting interventions from Prime Minister Gaston Browne, who publicly condemned these actions as attempts to undermine Antiguan sovereignty.
Spanning events between 2022 and 2025, the lawsuit outlines a series of fraudulent lawsuits, defamatory attacks, and deceptive infiltrations into David’s business operations. Individuals named specifically, like Dani Peretz, Daphne Barak, and Corey Feldman, are accused of extortion and stealing confidential data under misleading pretenses. The broader conspiracy is purportedly backed by significant financial and strategic support from high-profile figures, including Shari Redstone and Edgar Bronfman Sr., who allegedly sought to fend off justice and maintain corrupt interests at home while quashing dissent internationally.
The ramifications of the alleged conspiracy are profound, with David citing over $10 billion in damages attributed to lost contracts, harmed reputation, emotional distress, and diminished goodwill. Moreover, the lawsuit highlights the suspicious deaths of multiple whistleblowers and attorneys linked to David, such as Mark Lieberman and Barry Rothman, who reportedly died under circumstances thought to be linked to their cooperation with authorities.
David's lawsuit seeks a declaration of conspiracy, an injunction against the continuation of defamation, and full reparations for the extensive economic and reputational harm he has suffered. This legal endeavor represents a significant instance of a conspiracy claim that not only seeks justice for an individual but could also unearth alleged widespread corruption involving corporate and political entities across borders.
As the case awaits responses from the defendants, it sets the stage for what could potentially turn into a landmark trial, bringing to light the alleged networks of global corruption and their effects on sovereign nations.
