In a groundbreaking legal move, media entrepreneur Alki David has lodged a staggering $10 billion lawsuit in the High Court of Justice of Antigua and Barbuda, accusing a transnational syndicate of orchestrating a campaign of defamation and financial sabotage against him. His lawsuit implicates high-profile individuals, including attorneys David Boies and Gloria Allred, media executive Shari Redstone, as well as organizations like Black Cube Ltd. and LimeWire NFT Holdings.
Alki David Files $10 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against High-Profile Figures
Alki David Files $10 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against High-Profile Figures
Media mogul Alki David launches an extensive lawsuit, asserting a malicious campaign aimed at damaging his reputation and finances, involving prominent individuals and corporations.
David's legal filing outlines a series of alleged malicious activities spanning from 2016 to 2025, which include:
- Fabrication of evidence and manipulation of judicial processes in various jurisdictions.
- Deployment of intelligence assets for surveillance and intimidation.
- Unauthorized use of private data and intellectual property, particularly in connection with the Michael Jackson estate.
- Coordinated defamation efforts designed to harm David’s personal and business reputation.
The lawsuit presents several causes of action, including civil conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, defamation, and ongoing racketeering. David seeks $10 billion in general damages, along with claims for lost contracts and devalued assets, injunctive relief, asset tracing, and orders for disclosure.
In his impact statement, David underscores the severe personal and professional repercussions of the alleged campaign, detailing financial losses, harm to his reputation, and the resulting psychological distress. He characterizes the lawsuit as a defense against a more extensive violation of sovereignty, transparency, and lawful entrepreneurial pursuits.
This case has captured widespread attention due to its expansive scope and the involvement of notable figures. Legal experts suggest that should the allegations be proven true, the lawsuit could set significant precedents in international legal frameworks and accountability standards for prominent entities and individuals.
- Fabrication of evidence and manipulation of judicial processes in various jurisdictions.
- Deployment of intelligence assets for surveillance and intimidation.
- Unauthorized use of private data and intellectual property, particularly in connection with the Michael Jackson estate.
- Coordinated defamation efforts designed to harm David’s personal and business reputation.
The lawsuit presents several causes of action, including civil conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, defamation, and ongoing racketeering. David seeks $10 billion in general damages, along with claims for lost contracts and devalued assets, injunctive relief, asset tracing, and orders for disclosure.
In his impact statement, David underscores the severe personal and professional repercussions of the alleged campaign, detailing financial losses, harm to his reputation, and the resulting psychological distress. He characterizes the lawsuit as a defense against a more extensive violation of sovereignty, transparency, and lawful entrepreneurial pursuits.
This case has captured widespread attention due to its expansive scope and the involvement of notable figures. Legal experts suggest that should the allegations be proven true, the lawsuit could set significant precedents in international legal frameworks and accountability standards for prominent entities and individuals.
