The Indian government's proposal to amend a decades-old property law governing waqf assets has ignited a wave of protests among various Muslim organizations, who argue that the changes undermine their rights and are politically driven. The suggested modifications come amid serious allegations of corruption in the management of these properties, but critics warn of potential consequences for historical Muslim sites and a loss of community control.
Proposed Changes to Property Law Spark Protests Among Indian Muslims
Proposed Changes to Property Law Spark Protests Among Indian Muslims
Muslim groups in India are voicing strong opposition against a proposed law aimed at reforming waqf properties, citing concerns over minority rights and political motives.
A proposal to amend a crucial property law in India, affecting waqf properties—historically significant donations from Muslims—has resulted in widespread protests across the country. These waqf assets include mosques, madrassas, and thousands of acres of land, which are managed by a designated board. The current bill, introducing over 40 amendments, was anticipated to be discussed in parliament this session, yet the reviewing committee now seeks additional time to formulate its recommendations.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government justifies these changes as necessary reforms aimed at eradicating corruption within the management of waqf properties, responding to internal demands within the Muslim community. However, numerous Muslim organizations and opposition factions have criticized the bill as politically driven and an attempt by Modi's ruling party to diminish minority rights.
Waqf, signifying charitable or religious donations in Islamic tradition, encompasses properties earmarked for community benefit, generated many centuries ago during the Delhi Sultanate. Governed by the Waqf Act of 1995, these properties span over 940,000 acres and are valued around ₹1.2 trillion. The proposed amendments are viewed with skepticism, particularly regarding modifications to ownership rules that could impact historically significant religious sites.
While Muslim groups acknowledge corruption in waqf boards, they assert that the focus should also extend to the encroachments facing these properties, with government data indicating that thousands are under litigation or encroached upon. Although the Sachar Committee highlighted the necessity for reform in waqf management, many community members worry the government's new proposal may inadvertently disadvantage them.
One major concern centers around the lack of formal documentation for numerous sites, many of which lack proper legal records. The bill's alteration of the "waqf by user" provision could endanger many historically significant properties. Critics argue that requiring the inclusion of non-Muslims on waqf boards may dilute Muslim control over these crucial assets.
Moreover, the proposed changes hold significant implications for the legitimacy and recognition of numerous waqf properties. Asaduddin Owaisi, a noted Muslim MP, has criticized the bill, claiming that it threatens to dispossess Muslims of their land and reduce the authority of waqf boards. As the debate intensifies, many agree that reform is indeed necessary, yet express the need for such changes to adequately consider community sensitivities and preserve Muslim autonomy.
