In a striking shift, climate change is not a priority for Canadian voters in the upcoming election, overshadowed by concerns over international tensions, particularly with Donald Trump. Mark Carney, a seasoned climate advocate, has not made climate central to his strategy while leading the polls.
Climate Change Takes a Backseat in Canada’s Election Amid Global Tensions

Climate Change Takes a Backseat in Canada’s Election Amid Global Tensions
Despite rising environmental emergencies, climate change falls off voters' agendas in Canada’s latest election due to pressing political conflicts.
As Canada gears up for a pivotal election, issues surrounding climate change have surprisingly slipped to the sidelines. This appears striking against the backdrop of alarming environmental markers – melting Arctic ice and unprecedented wildfires throughout various provinces. According to recent surveys, climate change is not listed among the top ten concerns for Canadian voters.
"That’s not what this election revolves around," remarked Jessica Green, a political expert from the University of Toronto specializing in climate matters. Instead, the primary focus is on electing a leader who can effectively confront mounting pressures from U.S. President Donald Trump, who has discussed instigating a trade dispute with Canada, even suggesting its incorporation as the "51st state."
Mark Carney, a lead contender backed by the Liberal party, possesses vast experience in climate policy. His previous roles include serving as the United Nations Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance, alongside orchestrating a coalition of financial institutions committed to ceasing carbon emissions from their investments and lending activities by the year 2050. Nonetheless, Carney has not emphasized climate-related strategies as a focal point of his campaign.
Upon the resignation of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Carney’s initial action was to dismantle an unpopular fuel tax instituted by his predecessor, which encompassed gasoline purchases and was structured around emission levels. This move underscores a significant shift away from climate-centric policies in favor of addressing immediate political challenges in the election landscape.