The recent decision to end the de minimis import exemption in the US has sparked panic among shoppers and posed serious threats to smaller businesses. As consumers prepare for impending price hikes, shopping habits may be irrevocably altered.
E-commerce Shoppers Brace for Impact as Tariffs on Chinese Goods Set to Rise

E-commerce Shoppers Brace for Impact as Tariffs on Chinese Goods Set to Rise
Changes to US import regulations are shifting the online shopping landscape, raising costs and concerns among consumers.
In a significant shift in import policy, US shoppers like Deborah Grushkin from New Jersey are feeling the pressure as the government sets to abolish the de minimis exemption that allowed packages from China valued under $800 to enter the country without tariffs. Grushkin's $400 shopping spree on Shein represents a 'last hurrah' before the expected changes take effect. The move, which is expected to reign in the flood of low-cost imports, is supported by traditional retailers who claim it will reduce abuse of the rules previously favored by small-time online shoppers.
The decision, signed by President Trump, adds more time to businesses already suffering from strict tariffs, including steep 145% import fees on various goods. The once-popular de minimis rule surged in recent years, seeing shipments expand from negligible rates to over 1.4 billion packages entering the country in just a single year.
Among those voicing concern is 57-year-old Krystal DuFrene from Mississippi, who noted price hikes on the Temu platform and warned that consumers are the ones who ultimately bear the cost of tariffs. ”I don't know who pays the tariff except the customer,” she said, highlighting the increasing burden of expenses for lower-income families.
As the deadline fast approaches, platforms like Temu have begun shifting their sales model to locally based sellers in light of new tariffs. Economists have estimated that ending the de minimis rule could impose an additional $10.9 billion burden on consumers, affecting lower-income households the most.
Commenting on the implications, author Gee Davis from Missouri labeled the change a "money grab" by the government, expressing concern that individuals from lower economic brackets will be priced out of purchasing small luxuries.
Despite advocacy for smart trade and safety standards within the changing landscape, worries persist about the practical enforcement of new policies. Customs officials maintain they will uphold regulations, but critics fear that circumventing systems will still allow goods to enter undeterred.
Bigger retailers like Indochino have already voiced their worries about the viability of their operations in this new environment. In light of recent changes, the CEO of CUTS has hinted at potential price adjustments and even job cuts should the trend continue.
With economic implications looming large, many observers question whether current policies will create unmanageable challenges for both consumers and smaller American businesses as they grapple with a rapidly changing e-commerce reality.