President Donald Trump has come to the defense of Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth following reports of sensitive military operation details being shared within private Signal chat groups, amid broader concerns surrounding U.S. national security protocols.
Trump Defends Defence Secretary Amid Signal Chat Leak Controversy

Trump Defends Defence Secretary Amid Signal Chat Leak Controversy
President Trump expresses support for Defence Secretary Hegseth after revelations of leaked chats concerning military operations.
President Donald Trump has voiced his support for Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth after recent reports suggested that confidential military attack plans were discussed in a private Signal group chat that included Hegseth's wife, brother, and personal attorney. The allegations arise just weeks after a similar controversy, where discussions about U.S. military actions against Houthi rebels in Yemen were allegedly leaked to the media.
On Monday, Trump declared, "Pete's doing a great job," while downplaying the reports of military plans circulating in the second Signal chat. He reiterated his confidence in Hegseth, dismissing the media's focus on the leaks as "the same old stuff." Trump suggested the reports originated from "disgruntled employees," a sentiment echoed by Hegseth, who labeled the media as "hoaxsters" attempting to undermine him.
The White House has responded cautiously, neither confirming nor denying the existence of the second Signal chat, while assuring that no classified information was transmitted. According to CBS, the messages exchanged contained details about the operational flight schedules for F/A-18 Hornets performing strikes in Yemen. Jennifer Rauchet, Hegseth's wife and a former Fox News producer, along with his brother Phil and personal lawyer Tim Parlatore, are involved in the chat. Critics question the need for non-official personnel to have advanced knowledge of military operations.
This latest leak follows the revelation of the first Signal group, which came to light when Jeffrey Goldberg, the Atlantic editor, was accidentally included. While the White House maintained that no classified information was disclosed, former defense officials expressed concerns about the potential risks posed by such discussions.
Despite Signal’s end-to-end encryption, experts warn that there are still vulnerabilities that could lead to sensitive information being exposed. The new controversy arises against a backdrop of increased scrutiny regarding the Pentagon's management and the aftermath of Hegseth's decision to dismiss three officials for alleged unauthorized disclosures—a move that has been met with backlash from the affected parties.
Increasing tensions have evolved as John Ullyot, the recently resigned top Pentagon spokesperson, criticized the atmosphere within the department in a Sunday op-ed for Politico, labeling the current climate as chaotic and detrimental to the president's leadership. Meanwhile, the current Pentagon spokesman defended Hegseth, characterizing media coverage as hostile towards those committed to Trump’s agenda.
Recent U.S. airstrikes in Yemen have intensified following Houthi attacks on maritime vessels, with reports of significant casualties from recent operations. This ongoing situation highlights the delicate balance between military transparency and national security.
In the wider context, the Houthis have escalated their military actions in support of the Palestinian cause during the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict, raising stakes for U.S. interests in the region. As military tensions persist, the repercussions of the Signal leaks continue to unfold, increasing scrutiny on the Pentagon's communication strategies.