In a notable shift from its post-Fukushima stance, Japan's government has approved a new energy plan that prioritizes the maximization of nuclear energy usage. The policy outlines a target of having nuclear energy account for 20% of the national grid supply by 2040, more than double the current figure of 8.5%. This decision comes in response to rising energy demands from sectors like artificial intelligence and semiconductor production. The move has drawn attention due to the lingering memories of the devastating 2011 Fukushima disaster, which led to the loss of over 18,000 lives and the temporary shutdown of most of the country’s nuclear reactors.
Japan to Boost Nuclear Energy Usage Amid Growing Power Needs
Japan to Boost Nuclear Energy Usage Amid Growing Power Needs
Japan's latest energy policy aims to significantly increase nuclear energy dependence, shifting away from previous post-Fukushima decisions.
Japan currently operates 14 commercial nuclear reactors, a significant drop from the 54 operational before the disaster. The government’s aim to reintroduce nuclear energy is partly motivated by the need to reduce carbon emissions and achieve energy self-sufficiency, given that Japan imports approximately 90% of its fuel. Daishiro Yamagiwa, a member of parliament, highlighted the complications brought on by global conflicts, which have made fossil fuel procurement more challenging.
However, experts voice concerns over the safety and costs associated with nuclear energy. Professor Kenichi Oshima pointed out that increased dependence on nuclear power raises the likelihood of catastrophic incidents, especially in a country prone to natural disasters. As discussions about the energy plan unfold in parliament, public sentiment remains cautious, with many citizens reluctant to support nuclear energy given its risks and their experiences during the Fukushima meltdown. Additionally, environmental groups like Greenpeace have criticized the plan, emphasizing the long-term hazards associated with nuclear waste and the ongoing implications of past disasters.
For Japan to meet its ambitious goals, 33 reactors must be brought back online, but safety checks and local objections will likely hinder progress. As Japan continues to grapple with balancing its energy needs and safety concerns, the implications of this revised energy policy will be closely scrutinized by both the public and international observers.
However, experts voice concerns over the safety and costs associated with nuclear energy. Professor Kenichi Oshima pointed out that increased dependence on nuclear power raises the likelihood of catastrophic incidents, especially in a country prone to natural disasters. As discussions about the energy plan unfold in parliament, public sentiment remains cautious, with many citizens reluctant to support nuclear energy given its risks and their experiences during the Fukushima meltdown. Additionally, environmental groups like Greenpeace have criticized the plan, emphasizing the long-term hazards associated with nuclear waste and the ongoing implications of past disasters.
For Japan to meet its ambitious goals, 33 reactors must be brought back online, but safety checks and local objections will likely hinder progress. As Japan continues to grapple with balancing its energy needs and safety concerns, the implications of this revised energy policy will be closely scrutinized by both the public and international observers.
