In a landmark decision, a German court has decided that Birkenstock sandals, popularized recently by celebrities, do not meet the standards for copyright as they are merely functional design items. The ruling follows Birkenstock's attempt to stop competitors from selling similar knock-off products, claiming their footwear deserved protection under art classification. However, the presiding judge deemed the claim "unfounded," stating that the sandals, known for their practicality and comfort, lack the creative individuality needed for copyright. Continued pressure from rivals and legal disputes highlight the challenges Birkenstock faces amid its rising popularity and market valuation.
Birkenstock Sandals Fail to Qualify as Art, German Court Rules

Birkenstock Sandals Fail to Qualify as Art, German Court Rules
A German court has ruled against Birkenstock's claim that its sandals are art, thereby denying them copyright protection.
Birkenstock, a name once deemed uncool, has seen a resurgence in the fashion world, notably after actress Margot Robbie sported a pink pair in the blockbuster Barbie movie. Their appeal has reached new heights, particularly after electric endorsements from supermodels and appearances at high-profile events. Despite this ruling from Germany’s Federal Court of Justice, which comes after mixed lower court decisions, Birkenstock remains determined to fight against copycats, asserting its commitment to protecting its iconic designs. As the company continues to adapt and redefine its market presence, it has come to symbolize both evolution and enduring legacy in modern footwear.