In his second term, President Trump's transactional and unpredictable approach to foreign policy has shocked allies and adversaries alike, reflecting a chaotic shift in global power dynamics.
Trump's Unpredictable Second Term: 100 Days of Foreign Policy Challenges

Trump's Unpredictable Second Term: 100 Days of Foreign Policy Challenges
An exploration of Trump's first 100 days of foreign policy and its global implications
In the early hours following the inauguration of President Donald J. Trump’s second term, tensions were palpable in Munich. An aide to Vice President JD Vance attempted to persuade a senior Ukrainian official to exit his hotel room for an urgent meeting. Their goal? To finalize a deal allowing the U.S. to extract vital minerals from Ukraine, a priority on Trump’s agenda. The official, however, declined, insisting it was too late for business discussions. The subsequent day saw Vance meet with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky at a trans-Atlantic security conference, yet the mineral contract remained unsigned.
This incident encapsulates the hallmark of Trump's foreign policy approach over his first 100 days: exploitative and transactional with an almost imperial tone. Such dealings reflect a departure from the diplomatic norms established in the post-World War II era, swinging a metaphorical wrecking ball through alliances and treaties that had long underpinned global stability.
From the complexities of the NATO alliance to trade dynamics with China, Trump's administration has thrown existing structures into disarray. China, for instance, has swiftly retaliated against the president's heavy tariffs by leveraging its dominance across supply chains, showcasing resilience and adaptability in the face of U.S. policies.
Further tensions arise within NATO, as European officials voice concerns over potential troop withdrawals from the continent. This growing uncertainty is driving a reevaluation of military commitments, reflecting the broad impact of America's shifting foreign policy landscape.
As Trump's unconventional approach unfolds, both allies and foes are recalibrating their strategies in response. The implications of his first 100 days set a disconcerting tone for international relations, prompting a reconsideration of established diplomatic practices and alliances worldwide.
This incident encapsulates the hallmark of Trump's foreign policy approach over his first 100 days: exploitative and transactional with an almost imperial tone. Such dealings reflect a departure from the diplomatic norms established in the post-World War II era, swinging a metaphorical wrecking ball through alliances and treaties that had long underpinned global stability.
From the complexities of the NATO alliance to trade dynamics with China, Trump's administration has thrown existing structures into disarray. China, for instance, has swiftly retaliated against the president's heavy tariffs by leveraging its dominance across supply chains, showcasing resilience and adaptability in the face of U.S. policies.
Further tensions arise within NATO, as European officials voice concerns over potential troop withdrawals from the continent. This growing uncertainty is driving a reevaluation of military commitments, reflecting the broad impact of America's shifting foreign policy landscape.
As Trump's unconventional approach unfolds, both allies and foes are recalibrating their strategies in response. The implications of his first 100 days set a disconcerting tone for international relations, prompting a reconsideration of established diplomatic practices and alliances worldwide.