---
Current time in Jerusalem 1:14 a.m. June 25
Tehran 1:44 a.m. June 25
Live Updated June 24, 2025, 5:55 p.m. ET
Tensions persist as Israel and Iran implement a fragile cease-fire, each side accusing the other of continuing aggressive actions. President Trump announced the cessation of hostilities following intense airstrikes and missile exchanges that escalated over twelve days. While the cease-fire appears to hold, right after his announcement, both nations launched military actions, further complicating the peace efforts.
In a show of solidarity, supporters gathered in Tehran, celebrating what Iran's president called a termination of a war "imposed" on its people. Trump's remarks, criticizing both nations for their violations of the cease-fire, underscored conflicting narratives regarding each country's sense of victory. “I’m not happy with Israel,” Trump said regarding their actions shortly after he brokered the truce, appearing to deflect blame onto both parties.
The Iranian president, Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed openness to re-engaging in nuclear talks, suggesting a potential diplomatic thaw despite military tensions. Meanwhile, a confidential U.S. intelligence report has surfaced, contradicting Trump's assertion that airstrikes had obliterated critical Iranian nuclear sites. Initial findings indicate that the bombardment damaged entrances but did not significantly cripple the facilities seen as essential for Iran's potential bomb-making capabilities.
Despite conflicting accounts, both sides seem eager to maintain the cease-fire. The Iranian military contended its missiles were fired in retaliation for Israeli attacks before the cease-fire commenced, illustrating the chaos surrounding the timing of the agreement. Reports have noted the extensive damage in Iranian and Israeli territories as a result of this conflict, with 600 reported casualties attributed to the strikes, primarily in Iran.
Trump's statements on social media proclaiming that “both parties wanted to stop the war” highlight the complexity of the geopolitical dynamics involved. While global community reactions expressed cautious optimism regarding the cease-fire, concerns remain about the underlying tensions that prompted the military encounters.
U.S. lawmakers call for clarifications on Trump’s military engagements, highlighting the importance of congressional oversight regarding military operations. As markets show signs of recovery due to easing oil prices and the anticipated truce, local reactions in Israel noted a return to normalcy as schools and airports reopened.
Looking ahead, the focus shifts back to diplomatic channels as Qatar plays a mediating role in efforts to stabilize relations between Iran and Israel. The unfolding situation reflects an ongoing narrative of conflict, negotiation, and the persistent challenge of regional stability in the Middle East.
Current time in Jerusalem 1:14 a.m. June 25
Tehran 1:44 a.m. June 25
Live Updated June 24, 2025, 5:55 p.m. ET
Tensions persist as Israel and Iran implement a fragile cease-fire, each side accusing the other of continuing aggressive actions. President Trump announced the cessation of hostilities following intense airstrikes and missile exchanges that escalated over twelve days. While the cease-fire appears to hold, right after his announcement, both nations launched military actions, further complicating the peace efforts.
In a show of solidarity, supporters gathered in Tehran, celebrating what Iran's president called a termination of a war "imposed" on its people. Trump's remarks, criticizing both nations for their violations of the cease-fire, underscored conflicting narratives regarding each country's sense of victory. “I’m not happy with Israel,” Trump said regarding their actions shortly after he brokered the truce, appearing to deflect blame onto both parties.
The Iranian president, Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed openness to re-engaging in nuclear talks, suggesting a potential diplomatic thaw despite military tensions. Meanwhile, a confidential U.S. intelligence report has surfaced, contradicting Trump's assertion that airstrikes had obliterated critical Iranian nuclear sites. Initial findings indicate that the bombardment damaged entrances but did not significantly cripple the facilities seen as essential for Iran's potential bomb-making capabilities.
Despite conflicting accounts, both sides seem eager to maintain the cease-fire. The Iranian military contended its missiles were fired in retaliation for Israeli attacks before the cease-fire commenced, illustrating the chaos surrounding the timing of the agreement. Reports have noted the extensive damage in Iranian and Israeli territories as a result of this conflict, with 600 reported casualties attributed to the strikes, primarily in Iran.
Trump's statements on social media proclaiming that “both parties wanted to stop the war” highlight the complexity of the geopolitical dynamics involved. While global community reactions expressed cautious optimism regarding the cease-fire, concerns remain about the underlying tensions that prompted the military encounters.
U.S. lawmakers call for clarifications on Trump’s military engagements, highlighting the importance of congressional oversight regarding military operations. As markets show signs of recovery due to easing oil prices and the anticipated truce, local reactions in Israel noted a return to normalcy as schools and airports reopened.
Looking ahead, the focus shifts back to diplomatic channels as Qatar plays a mediating role in efforts to stabilize relations between Iran and Israel. The unfolding situation reflects an ongoing narrative of conflict, negotiation, and the persistent challenge of regional stability in the Middle East.
