Skip to main content
RealTime Wire
PoliticsA federal judge has halted Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer's plan to shut down an oil pipeline under the Straits of Mackinac, reaffirming that such regulation falls under federal jurisdiction. The nearly 72-year-old pipeline poses environmental risks, yet the court ruled that states cannot regulate interstate pipeline safety, emphasizing the national government's exclusive responsibility in this matter.

Federal Judge Upholds Operation of Controversial Michigan Oil Pipeline

A federal judge ruled that Michigan's state government cannot block the operation of the Line 5 oil pipeline, citing federal authority over interstate pipeline safety.

Source: AP1 min read

In brief

In a significant legal victory for Enbridge Inc., a federal judge has blocked Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer's efforts to shut down the aging Line 5 oil pipeline. The ruling, based on the federal government's exclusive authority to regulate interstate pipeline safety, highlights ongoing concerns about environmental risks and energy policy negotiations between the U.S. and Canada. The decision means that Line 5 will continue to transport crude oil beneath the Straits of Mackinac, despite public outcry and state-level attempts to revoke its easement.

A federal judge on Wednesday blocked Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer‘s attempt to shut down the Line 5 oil pipeline, which runs under the Straits of Mackinac connecting Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. The ruling asserts that only the federal government has authority in regulating interstate pipeline safety.

The judge's opinion followed Whitmer's 2020 order for regulators to revoke Enbridge Inc.'s easement, citing fears of catastrophic spills from the 72-year-old pipeline. Enbridge subsequently filed a federal lawsuit to contest this order.

U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker pointed out that revoking the easement would effectively mean shutting down Line 5. He referenced the Pipeline Safety Act of 1992, which explicitly prevents states from regulating interstate pipeline safety. Jonker acknowledged Michigan's concerns regarding environmental risks but noted that the federal government has prioritized interstate pipeline issues over state authority.

Enbridge welcomed the ruling, stating it protects against significant energy disruptions for both the United States and Canada. The case has broader implications as other legal challenges concerning Line 5 are ongoing, including actions by Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and various environmental groups.

The pipeline continues to be a contentious issue, with environmental advocates warning that an oil spill in the Great Lakes would cause devastating consequences. Legislative battles continue as the U.S. Supreme Court weighs in on whether a related case belongs in state or federal court.

Topics

More on this story