The upcoming election is crucial for Ecuadorians as they grapple with daily violence, kidnappings, and a deteriorating quality of life.
Ecuador's Presidential Election: A Battle Against Rising Gang Violence

Ecuador's Presidential Election: A Battle Against Rising Gang Violence
As Ecuador heads to the polls, escalating gang violence has become the focal point of the presidential election, challenging candidates to address a crisis of security.
In the backdrop of escalating gang violence, Ecuador's presidential election is looming, with security at the forefront of voters' concerns. "It feels as if our town is in a state of lockdown due to constant fear of violence," says 'Jorge' (a pseudonym) from Guayaquil, where his father was a victim of kidnapping by the local gang, Los Tiguerones. Without interventions, a person in Ecuador is reportedly murdered every two hours, and seven individuals are kidnapped daily, exacerbating the security crisis.
With 16 challengers, incumbent President Daniel Noboa is set to defend his position in a race heavily criticized for ineffective security responses. Historically viewed as one of the safest countries, Ecuador has spiraled into chaos, attributed to its geographical position and growing international cocaine demand. The drug trade flows through the nation's ports, intensifying gang warfare and criminal activities.
Jorge's harrowing experience resonates with many as he recalls the terror of receiving messages from kidnappers who initially demanded $100,000 for his father's release. After negotiations, he was left devastated when police discovered his father's lifeless body, a grim reminder of the gang's ruthlessness. In his now fortified home, he grapples with the aftermath of his father's death, having lost his family to the violence that engulfs Guayaquil.
The Noboa administration's approach has included militarizing security efforts, empowering police with increased authority to combat gangs. Jorge supports this crackdown but critiques the justice system for failing to hold criminals accountable. Major Cristian Aldaz, a police official, shared the perspective that while human rights are important, civilians also deserve protection amid a battle against powerful crime syndicates.
Though polls suggest Noboa remains a frontrunner, his support has dwindled, particularly against left-wing candidate Luisa González. González advocates for human rights education for security forces and proposes expanding police numbers while condemning the excesses associated with militarization. Her platform aims to balance the immediate need for security with respecting human rights, a contentious issue particularly highlighted by the unsolved disappearances of teenagers by the military.
Reports involving the military’s alleged crimes amplify ongoing fears, with families demanding accountability for tragedies like the disappearance of Luis Arroyo's sons. The father's grief underscores the dilemma many Ecuadorians face: how to navigate between inadequate security and potential abuses.
As voters prepare to head to the ballots, the discontent escalates, with many seeking change as violence and criminality continue unabated. Citizens like Carlos and Laura Ipaneque, who tragically lost their son to military gunfire during a panic, embody a collective community fear overshadowing the election. Their cries reflect the urgent need for leaders who can address these complex realities.
Ultimately, the outcome of Ecuador's election rests on whether citizens perceive current security measures as more harmful than the violence plaguing their everyday lives, marking a pivotal moment for the country's future. The nation stands at a crossroads, with its citizens desperate for effective governance in the face of overwhelming violence.
With 16 challengers, incumbent President Daniel Noboa is set to defend his position in a race heavily criticized for ineffective security responses. Historically viewed as one of the safest countries, Ecuador has spiraled into chaos, attributed to its geographical position and growing international cocaine demand. The drug trade flows through the nation's ports, intensifying gang warfare and criminal activities.
Jorge's harrowing experience resonates with many as he recalls the terror of receiving messages from kidnappers who initially demanded $100,000 for his father's release. After negotiations, he was left devastated when police discovered his father's lifeless body, a grim reminder of the gang's ruthlessness. In his now fortified home, he grapples with the aftermath of his father's death, having lost his family to the violence that engulfs Guayaquil.
The Noboa administration's approach has included militarizing security efforts, empowering police with increased authority to combat gangs. Jorge supports this crackdown but critiques the justice system for failing to hold criminals accountable. Major Cristian Aldaz, a police official, shared the perspective that while human rights are important, civilians also deserve protection amid a battle against powerful crime syndicates.
Though polls suggest Noboa remains a frontrunner, his support has dwindled, particularly against left-wing candidate Luisa González. González advocates for human rights education for security forces and proposes expanding police numbers while condemning the excesses associated with militarization. Her platform aims to balance the immediate need for security with respecting human rights, a contentious issue particularly highlighted by the unsolved disappearances of teenagers by the military.
Reports involving the military’s alleged crimes amplify ongoing fears, with families demanding accountability for tragedies like the disappearance of Luis Arroyo's sons. The father's grief underscores the dilemma many Ecuadorians face: how to navigate between inadequate security and potential abuses.
As voters prepare to head to the ballots, the discontent escalates, with many seeking change as violence and criminality continue unabated. Citizens like Carlos and Laura Ipaneque, who tragically lost their son to military gunfire during a panic, embody a collective community fear overshadowing the election. Their cries reflect the urgent need for leaders who can address these complex realities.
Ultimately, the outcome of Ecuador's election rests on whether citizens perceive current security measures as more harmful than the violence plaguing their everyday lives, marking a pivotal moment for the country's future. The nation stands at a crossroads, with its citizens desperate for effective governance in the face of overwhelming violence.