Antoinette Lattouf's victory highlights issues of editorial integrity and diversity at Australia’s public broadcaster.
Australian Journalist Antoinette Lattouf Wins Unfair Dismissal Case Against ABC

Australian Journalist Antoinette Lattouf Wins Unfair Dismissal Case Against ABC
A court sides with Lattouf, ruling her sacking related to political views and social media actions over the Gaza war.
In a landmark ruling, Australian journalist Antoinette Lattouf has successfully claimed her dismissal from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) was unjust. The decision follows her termination following a social media post concerning the ongoing war in Gaza, which ABC asserted was in violation of its editorial standards. The court found that her contract, initially intended to last five days, was inappropriately terminated in December 2023.
Lattouf, who is of Lebanese descent, expressed that her sacking stemmed not only from her personal political stance but also suggested influences from external pro-Israel entities seeking her removal. Detailing the turmoil surrounding her dismissal, she cited significant public backlash that questioned the ABC's editorial independence and its treatment of employees from diverse backgrounds.
ABC, however, pushed back against claims of a wrongful termination, maintaining that they had fulfilled her contract obligations. In a court session led by Justice Darryl Rangiah, it was determined that her firing was indeed linked to her social media opinion on Israel's military actions, even as the allegation of racial discrimination was dismissed. The court awarded Lattouf damages amounting to A$70,000, with a possibility for further discussions on additional penalties.
The controversy erupted just after Lattouf had aimed to adhere to the broadcaster's guidelines by limiting her social media output after being hired as a temporary presenter for their Mornings program. Despite agreeing to such terms, it was revealed during proceedings that her management had permitted sharing reputable sources, leading to her sharing of a Human Rights Watch post critiquing Israel’s military strategy, which the ABC itself had reported on previously.
Lattouf's abrupt dismissal sent shockwaves within the media community and sparked discussion about the role of external pressures in shaping media narratives. Evidence presented in court illustrated that management at the ABC had been subject to external communications demanding Lattouf's removal prior to her post. Moreover, Lattouf’s manager indicated that concerns were raised "from higher up" concerning her role.
The ABC's legal representation, Ian Neil SC, contended that Lattouf’s abrupt removal was merely a refocusing of duties rather than a punitive measure. He argued that taking her off the air was intended to safeguard the ABC’s image, not to penalize the journalist.
With Lattouf’s case now echoing broader concerns about media freedom and diversity, it stands as a significant reference point within the ongoing discourse on how media organizations navigate politically sensitive issues. The world watches as this develops further.