The arrest of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte by the I.C.C. comes as a direct response to accusations of crimes against humanity linked to his controversial drug campaign, despite ongoing jurisdictional disputes following the country's withdrawal from the court.
Former Philippine President Duterte Arrested by I.C.C. Amid Jurisdiction Disputes

Former Philippine President Duterte Arrested by I.C.C. Amid Jurisdiction Disputes
Rodrigo Duterte's arrest by the International Criminal Court raises significant questions regarding legal jurisdiction after the Philippines exited the court.
Rodrigo Duterte, the former president of the Philippines, was apprehended on Tuesday at Villamor Air Base in Pasay, mere days after a secret arrest warrant was issued by the International Criminal Court (I.C.C.) due to allegations of crimes against humanity. This event signifies a pivotal moment for the I.C.C., a body founded to address serious global crimes including genocide and war crimes, as it navigates complex questions of legal jurisdiction.
The I.C.C.'s prosecutor's office initiated an investigation into Duterte in 2018, following widespread accusations that his administration’s aggressive anti-drug campaign resulted in the deaths of roughly 30,000 individuals, many of whom were innocent of drug-related offenses. Human rights activists have condemned these violent executions and highlighted the involvement of state forces and hired killers.
The I.C.C. operates under the Rome Statute, an international treaty ratified by 125 countries. Following the announcement of the I.C.C. investigation, Duterte announced the Philippines would withdraw from the treaty, which became official in March 2019. Despite this, I.C.C. judges contend that the court retains jurisdiction over actions that occurred prior to the Philippines' exit, citing the date of the allegations.
Duterte's legal representation has labeled the arrest as illegal, coupling their assertions with claims of the court lacking jurisdiction in light of the Philippines' withdrawal. This controversy will undoubtedly be a focal point of international legal scrutiny as the situation unfolds.