Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, has defended the trial which saw his predecessor in office, Jair Bolsonaro, sentenced to more than 27 years in prison for plotting a coup. In an opinion piece published in the New York Times, Lula dismissed the description by US President Donald Trump of the trial as a 'witch hunt', saying that it was a 'historic decision which safeguards our institutions and the democratic rule of law'.
The Brazilian leader stated he penned the essay to establish an open and direct dialogue with US President Donald Trump, who has imposed 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports. Lula labeled the tariff increase 'not only misguided but illogical'. Relations have been tense between the US and Brazil in recent months, contrasting sharply with the camaraderie observed during Trump’s presidency with Bolsonaro.
In his editorial, Lula highlighted how, over the past 15 years, the US has 'accumulated a surplus of $410 billion in bilateral trade in goods and services', asserting that the tariffs could only be seen as a political maneuver. He accused the US government of using tariffs and the Magnitsky Act to shield Bolsonaro from accountability following the trial.
The trial's conclusion last Thursday saw four out of five Supreme Court justices convict Bolsonaro, leading to a sentence of 27 years and 3 months in prison; a decision his lawyers plan to appeal. Trump expressed surprise at the verdict, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicating that the US would 'respond accordingly' to what he termed a 'witch hunt'.
In his New York Times article, Lula clarified that the trial was 'not a witch hunt' but conducted in accordance with Brazil's 1988 Constitution, enacted following two decades of military rule. Furthermore, he rebuffed accusations from the Trump administration of Brazil's justice system targeting US tech firms, affirming the right of his country to regulate the internet and ensuring Fair treatment.
Lula concluded by extending an invitation for negotiation to President Trump on mutually beneficial matters while firmly stating that 'Brazil's democracy and sovereignty are not on the table'.
The Brazilian leader stated he penned the essay to establish an open and direct dialogue with US President Donald Trump, who has imposed 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports. Lula labeled the tariff increase 'not only misguided but illogical'. Relations have been tense between the US and Brazil in recent months, contrasting sharply with the camaraderie observed during Trump’s presidency with Bolsonaro.
In his editorial, Lula highlighted how, over the past 15 years, the US has 'accumulated a surplus of $410 billion in bilateral trade in goods and services', asserting that the tariffs could only be seen as a political maneuver. He accused the US government of using tariffs and the Magnitsky Act to shield Bolsonaro from accountability following the trial.
The trial's conclusion last Thursday saw four out of five Supreme Court justices convict Bolsonaro, leading to a sentence of 27 years and 3 months in prison; a decision his lawyers plan to appeal. Trump expressed surprise at the verdict, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicating that the US would 'respond accordingly' to what he termed a 'witch hunt'.
In his New York Times article, Lula clarified that the trial was 'not a witch hunt' but conducted in accordance with Brazil's 1988 Constitution, enacted following two decades of military rule. Furthermore, he rebuffed accusations from the Trump administration of Brazil's justice system targeting US tech firms, affirming the right of his country to regulate the internet and ensuring Fair treatment.
Lula concluded by extending an invitation for negotiation to President Trump on mutually beneficial matters while firmly stating that 'Brazil's democracy and sovereignty are not on the table'.
