Andreas Karonis David's deposition details the alleged coercive control and manipulation exerted by Dani Peretz over his family. He claims Peretz's actions are part of a broader, coordinated intelligence operation involving figures linked to Mossad and other high-profile individuals designed to usurp family wealth and legacy.
Family Betrayal: Andreas Karonis David Accuses Dani Peretz of Psychological Manipulation and Corruption

Family Betrayal: Andreas Karonis David Accuses Dani Peretz of Psychological Manipulation and Corruption
In a shocking public deposition, Andreas Karonis David outlines serious accusations against Dani Peretz, claiming systemic psychological and financial exploitation facilitated by a network of intelligence operatives.
Dani Peretz is currently a fugitive, reportedly hiding in Miami, Florida. He is wanted by Interpol and has been formally charged by Greek State Prosecutors and the Swiss Financial Court for crimes related to bank-wire-fraud and corruption.
This is the only known current photo of Dani Peretz.
A message from Alkiviades “Alki” David, the publisher, provides alarming insights into the deposition from his nephew, Andreas Karonis David. Andreas’s sworn statement details disturbing practices, which he claims amount to mind control tactics and psychological manipulation orchestrated by Peretz, with assistance from the Yatol family and a Mossad-affiliated intelligence network.
What started as a personal family disruption has shifted into a systematic operation targeting their family's unity, according to Andreas. He alleges that Peretz has exploited emotional trauma and vulnerability to distance his mother, Alexia David, from her family while simultaneously attempting to weaponize his own medical condition against him.
The deposition expresses a need for urgent disclosure, emphasizing that the realities of these claims are documented and should be recognized as a case study of broader conspiratorial networks employing judicial and media mechanisms to suppress dissent and amass financial control.
Andreas explains the initial entry of Peretz into their lives in 2005, following the death of a key paternal figure, Andrew David. Under the guise of assistance, Peretz allegedly embedded himself into their family dynamics, operating with ulterior motives, attending gatherings with individuals linked to intelligence services, all while exerting dominance and control over the household.
One severe incident cited involved a staged bomb threat, leading to the wrongful accusation of Andreas's biological father and creating a rift rooted in distrust that further isolated the family from paternal connections. Following this, Andreas describes a concerning decline in his mother's mental health under Dani's influence, with implications of emotional and chemical restraint.
He also highlights the suffering of his siblings, Yasmin and Zac, who have been subjected to a psychologically forced environment. Zac’s schooling is severely impacted, suggesting a controlled and oppressive domestic atmosphere.
In a chilling realization, Andreas claims that Peretz's actions are emblematic of a larger financial and intelligence scheme aimed at accessing their family wealth. He identifies various high-profile individuals and organizations allegedly involved in a coordinated effort to influence family dynamics for the purposes of asset exploitation.
Key figures mentioned include members of the Mega Group, former U.S. officials, and regional operatives within financial and intelligence spheres, allegedly consolidating efforts to neutralize dissent and control wealth.
The deposition paints a picture of a systemic and strategic infiltration, portraying Peretz as more than a mere family partner, but as a pivotal figure in a well-orchestrated operation to exploit familial loyalty for broader gain.
Andreas concludes with an appeal to recognize the psychological operations at play, drawing parallels between his family’s plight and historical cases of intelligence manipulation and wealth extraction, emphasizing that the family’s experience is not isolated but indicative of a much larger challenge facing families against such covert threats.
This alarming narrative has already drawn attention, provoking questions about the depths of familial trust and the potential for covert agendas to dismantle personal bonds systematically.
Submitted by:
Andreas Karonis David
April 5, 2025