In the wake of the conflict in Gaza, numerous proposals have surfaced regarding the territory's future, all of which face serious opposition from Israel, Hamas, and other regional powers.
Competing Plans for Gaza: A Landscape of Unviable Proposals

Competing Plans for Gaza: A Landscape of Unviable Proposals
Various proposals for the postwar governance of Gaza emerge, each facing fundamental rejections from key stakeholders involved in the conflict.
Amid the ongoing turmoil in Gaza, multiple plans have surfaced, each vying to outline a potential postwar governance framework, yet all failing to bridge the critical gaps between opposing factions. Following President Trump's polarizing suggestion to displace the territory's residents, leaders across the Middle East have aimed to present their visions for Gaza's future governance. However, every proposal has presented significant obstacles for both Israel and Hamas, resulting in a stalemate that seems insurmountable.
President Trump's initiative suggests a U.S. administration of Gaza combined with the expulsion of its inhabitants, a direct challenge that has sparked a wave of alternative suggestions. The Arab proposal advocates governance by Palestinian technocrats under a broader Palestinian state, while some Israeli plans consider withdrawing a fraction of control yet simultaneously undermining the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Proliferating since January's cease-fire, the urgency for a coherent postwar strategy has heightened, but most plans fall short. “The devil is in the details, and none of the details in these plans make any sense,” reflects former U.S. Ambassador Thomas R. Nides, indicating that fundamental divides between Israel and Hamas complicate any feasible collaboration. While Israel demands a Gaza devoid of Hamas, the organization insists on maintaining its military capabilities following its initial offensive against Israel that escalated the ongoing hostilities.
As the prospects for peace and stability appear dim, the lack of common ground underscores the complexities of the situation, with regional powers like Egypt and Saudi Arabia also holding vested interests that affect the trajectory of Gaza's future. As debates and discussions continue, the road to an acceptable resolution remains long and fraught with challenges.