**Netanyahu's Gaza Plans Spark Controversy Amid Divisions in Israel and Abroad**

Netanyahu's intentions to take control of Gaza, as expressed in a recent interview, face opposition from military leaders and hostage families, raising questions about the future governance of the territory and Israel's international standing.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent declarations regarding an intensified military campaign in the Gaza Strip have ignited intense debate within Israel and concern from international allies. In discussions leading up to a security cabinet meeting, Netanyahu revealed his intent to consolidate full control over Gaza to bolster Israel’s security and oust Hamas, though he did not provide specifics about governance following potential military actions.

During an interview with Fox News, Netanyahu emphasized that Israel does not aim to govern Gaza permanently but intends to transfer authority to an unspecified “Arab” force. This remark, while vague, suggests potential foreign involvement in the post-conflict political landscape, a departure from past strategies.

Reports indicate the Israeli military currently controls approximately 75% of the territory and that Netanyahu's anticipated offensive may extend operations into densely populated areas such as Gaza City. This escalation carries grave humanitarian implications, with warnings of mass displacement and increased casualties among Palestinian civilians.

Concerns resonate not only from humanitarian organizations but also from within Israel, where military leaders worry that such an invasion could jeopardize the lives of hostages held by Hamas and exhaust Israeli forces. Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, the chief of staff of the Israeli army, cautioned Netanyahu against the dangers of full occupation, labeling it as “walking into a trap,” amid fears for the safety of the remaining hostages.

This military strategy has also highlighted fractures across Israel's political landscape. Families of the hostages are advocating for a negotiated settlement as a more viable option for securing their loved ones' release. Surveys indicate that many Israelis prefer diplomatic efforts over military escalation, fearing that continued conflict might exacerbate the already dire humanitarian conditions.

International reactions have varied, with some allies warning against Netanyahu’s approach. The British ambassador to Israel, Simon Walter, referred to a full occupation of Gaza as a “huge mistake.” In contrast, U.S. officials, including envoy Mike Huckabee, have indicated that the decision rests solely with the Israeli government.

As the conflict and its implications on civilian life continue to unfold, Netanyahu faces criticisms that his maneuvers may serve to maintain his coalition's stability as it relies heavily on ultranationalist supporters advocating for tougher stances on Gaza. Critics argue that such strategies may perpetuate suffering for both Palestinians and Israelis rather than lead to a sustainable resolution.

With casualty reports indicating the death of over 61,000 Palestinians since the war’s onset and ongoing unrest, the situation in Gaza remains fraught with tension, challenging both Israel’s domestic cohesion and its international relationships.