In a statement, an Argentine presidential spokesperson articulated that the country's decision stems from “deep differences regarding health management,” emphasizing frustrations with lockdown guidelines that they claim lacked scientific support. The timing of this maneuver is noteworthy as it aligns closely with Trump's actions, illustrating a parallel in their governance styles and perspectives on international cooperation in health crises.

Milei has previously criticized the WHO, describing it as ineffective in responding to global health challenges since its inception. He views the proposed exit as a means of reclaiming sovereignty over domestic health policies and financial decisions, suggesting the move could also save Argentina approximately $10 million per year in membership fees.

The presidential office indicated that Milei intends to sign an executive order to commence the withdrawal process soon. During a press briefing, spokesperson Manuel Adorni asserted that Argentina would not permit an international organization to interfere in its affairs, particularly concerning health matters.

The relationship between Milei and Trump is characterized by mutual esteem, with both leaders acknowledging each other positively in public statements. As speculation swirls regarding Milei's future international agreements, environmental advocates express concerns that this may foreshadow a potential exit from treaties like the Paris climate agreement, mirroring the U.S. "America First" policy under Trump.

As Milei's administration continues to shape Argentina's international posture, the implications of distancing from the WHO remain to be seen, marking a significant shift in the nation's approach to global health governance.