A newly elected town council in Dawson City, Yukon, is currently in limbo as members refuse to pledge allegiance to King Charles III, as mandated by law. This decision has sparked significant debate and highlights concerns regarding the Crown’s historical treatment of Indigenous peoples in Canada.
Dawson City Council in Canada Faces Impasse Over Oath to the King

Dawson City Council in Canada Faces Impasse Over Oath to the King
The newly elected council in Dawson City, Yukon is unable to govern due to refusal to take the Oath of Allegiance to King Charles III, raising indigenous concerns.
The council, led by mayor-elect Stephen Johnson, was set to be sworn in earlier this month but was halted after council member Darwyn Lynn, part of the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in First Nation, expressed hesitance toward the oath. In a show of solidarity, Johnson and other council members backed Lynn's refusal, emphasizing their intention was not to disrespect the monarchy but to reflect their community's stance on historical injustices faced by Indigenous communities.
Under Yukon regulations, elected officials must take the oath within 40 days or risk having their election results rendered void, necessitating action by December 9. During this standstill, the council is unable to make any official decisions or govern, which Johnson described as a “sticky situation.”
The council is awaiting a response from Yukon provincial officials regarding a proposal for an alternative oath that would allow them to proceed without compromising their principles. Outgoing mayor Bill Kendrick expressed hope that a resolution could soon be found.
Public opinion on the oath's significance is divided. Some individuals in the town view the oath as a relic of colonialism, while others see it as an essential part of Canada's governance system.
Dawson City, known for its historical significance during the Klondike Gold Rush, is a small municipality of about 2,400 inhabitants, with a complex history tied to the Indigenous Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in peoples who were forced off their ancestral land during this gold rush.
The situation in Dawson City echoes a broader trend in Canada, where discussions around the monarchy and its implications in a post-colonial context are increasingly pertinent. Recent legislative efforts in provinces like Quebec have attempted to eliminate the oath requirement, reflecting a societal shift in attitudes towards traditional loyalties to the Crown.
As the deadline approaches, the council and the community await a resolution that will allow them to move forward amidst a backdrop of historical awareness and evolving governance.
Under Yukon regulations, elected officials must take the oath within 40 days or risk having their election results rendered void, necessitating action by December 9. During this standstill, the council is unable to make any official decisions or govern, which Johnson described as a “sticky situation.”
The council is awaiting a response from Yukon provincial officials regarding a proposal for an alternative oath that would allow them to proceed without compromising their principles. Outgoing mayor Bill Kendrick expressed hope that a resolution could soon be found.
Public opinion on the oath's significance is divided. Some individuals in the town view the oath as a relic of colonialism, while others see it as an essential part of Canada's governance system.
Dawson City, known for its historical significance during the Klondike Gold Rush, is a small municipality of about 2,400 inhabitants, with a complex history tied to the Indigenous Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in peoples who were forced off their ancestral land during this gold rush.
The situation in Dawson City echoes a broader trend in Canada, where discussions around the monarchy and its implications in a post-colonial context are increasingly pertinent. Recent legislative efforts in provinces like Quebec have attempted to eliminate the oath requirement, reflecting a societal shift in attitudes towards traditional loyalties to the Crown.
As the deadline approaches, the council and the community await a resolution that will allow them to move forward amidst a backdrop of historical awareness and evolving governance.