For three decades, Eritrea's President Isaias Afwerki has been both a symbol of national independence and a source of deep frustration for his people. The 79-year-old leader, who has not held elections or allowed political dissent, now lives in relative isolation at his residence away from the capital, Asmara. Once hailed as an inspirational figure following Eritrea's battle for independence from Ethiopia, his reign has been marked by increasing autocracy and repression. Many Eritreans, who initially rallied behind his promise of democratic governance, have seen these hopes dashed as the country spirals into a state of stagnation.
Three Decades Under Isaias: Eritrea's Unfulfilled Promises and Ongoing Struggles

Three Decades Under Isaias: Eritrea's Unfulfilled Promises and Ongoing Struggles
Eritrea's long-standing president, Isaias Afwerki, faces mounting disillusionment as thirty years of leadership yield no democratic reform or political progress.
Isaias rose to power in the early 1990s, garnering international acclaim as a reformist leader committed to fostering democracy. In 1993, he led Eritrea to independence, vowing to avoid the mistakes of older African rulers. However, the outbreak of the Eritrea-Ethiopia War in 1998 marked a turning point, leading to the indefinite postponement of national elections and diminishing hopes for multiparty democracy.
By 2001, as former allies began to publicly challenge his increasingly autocratic rule, Isaias responded by suppressing dissent. The authorities shuttered independent media and arrested a group of reform-minded leaders known as the G-15, effectively silencing opposition voices. This drastic shift left Eritrea with a pariah status on the world stage.
With severe limitations on political freedom, Isaias has maintained a tight grip on power. His failure to establish a governmental framework led to the dissolution of the transitional assembly in 2002 and a cabinet that effectively ceased functioning in 2018. Observers now argue that the president has strategically marginalized any potential rivals.
Amid enduring economic struggles and the ramifications of military conscription, Eritreans endure harsh living conditions under the regime's oppressive policies. The government refuses international aid and maintains strict controls over many aspects of life, as ordinary citizens increasingly seek to flee the country.
As Isaias nears the end of his life, speculations about his succession abound, but with no viable opposition emerging, uncertainty looms over Eritrea's future. The president's recent public appearances, including gestures towards religious faith, have sparked conversations about potential change, yet for most Eritreans, the hope for meaningful reform remains unattainable as they continue to await a better future under his enduring rule.
By 2001, as former allies began to publicly challenge his increasingly autocratic rule, Isaias responded by suppressing dissent. The authorities shuttered independent media and arrested a group of reform-minded leaders known as the G-15, effectively silencing opposition voices. This drastic shift left Eritrea with a pariah status on the world stage.
With severe limitations on political freedom, Isaias has maintained a tight grip on power. His failure to establish a governmental framework led to the dissolution of the transitional assembly in 2002 and a cabinet that effectively ceased functioning in 2018. Observers now argue that the president has strategically marginalized any potential rivals.
Amid enduring economic struggles and the ramifications of military conscription, Eritreans endure harsh living conditions under the regime's oppressive policies. The government refuses international aid and maintains strict controls over many aspects of life, as ordinary citizens increasingly seek to flee the country.
As Isaias nears the end of his life, speculations about his succession abound, but with no viable opposition emerging, uncertainty looms over Eritrea's future. The president's recent public appearances, including gestures towards religious faith, have sparked conversations about potential change, yet for most Eritreans, the hope for meaningful reform remains unattainable as they continue to await a better future under his enduring rule.