As President Trump's administration embraces seabed mining, a fierce debate ensues in Congress regarding the environmental risks and the future of metal mining as the industry faces evolving technology.
Trump's Seabed Mining Initiative Sparks Congressional Debate

Trump's Seabed Mining Initiative Sparks Congressional Debate
President Trump's executive order to expedite seabed mining has ignited a heated discussion among congressional leaders over environmental implications and business viability.
April 29, 2025, 4:26 p.m. ET — In the wake of President Trump’s recent executive order promoting seabed mining, the Metals Company has submitted the United States' first permit application, marking a significant step towards untested mineral extraction practices. Chief executive Gerard Barron heralded Trump's directive as the "starting gun" for the controversial endeavor, which focuses on mining valuable minerals like cobalt and nickel from the ocean floor’s potato-sized nodules located deep within the Pacific.
During a congressional natural resources committee hearing on Tuesday, committee members sharply divided along party lines while addressing the environmental implications of seabed mining. The fervor over environmental protection was intensified after the Trump administration announced its intent to issue permits for mining activities in both U.S. territorial waters and international zones. Many critics argue that this move undermines international regulations set forth by the International Seabed Authority.
In response to the push for seabed mining, Democratic Representative Jared Huffman of California expressed concern, characterizing the actions of the Metals Company and the Trump administration as a “reckless cowboy manner.” Lawmakers voiced skepticism regarding the economic foundation of mining cobalt and nickel, particularly as advancements in electric vehicle technology trend towards minimizing reliance on these metals.
The congressional discussion highlights the broader dichotomy between economic opportunity and environmental stewardship, setting the stage for ongoing debates as the U.S. considers the future of seabed resource extraction.
During a congressional natural resources committee hearing on Tuesday, committee members sharply divided along party lines while addressing the environmental implications of seabed mining. The fervor over environmental protection was intensified after the Trump administration announced its intent to issue permits for mining activities in both U.S. territorial waters and international zones. Many critics argue that this move undermines international regulations set forth by the International Seabed Authority.
In response to the push for seabed mining, Democratic Representative Jared Huffman of California expressed concern, characterizing the actions of the Metals Company and the Trump administration as a “reckless cowboy manner.” Lawmakers voiced skepticism regarding the economic foundation of mining cobalt and nickel, particularly as advancements in electric vehicle technology trend towards minimizing reliance on these metals.
The congressional discussion highlights the broader dichotomy between economic opportunity and environmental stewardship, setting the stage for ongoing debates as the U.S. considers the future of seabed resource extraction.